Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs GeForce 805A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated30
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.08
Power efficiencyno data19.33
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGK208Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)27 July 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speed719 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz2245 MHz
Number of transistors915 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate12.13718.4
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs16320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L1 Cache32 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 260 Watt

GeForce 805A has 1633% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 GRE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and Radeon RX 7900 GRE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1228 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 805A or Radeon RX 7900 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.