RTX A1000 vs GeForce 805A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data39.66
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922304
Core clock speed719 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors915 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate12.13105.3
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1672
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cache32 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.58.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 805A has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and RTX A1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 54 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 805A or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.