P102-100 vs GeForce 805A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.92
Power efficiencyno data2.64
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK208GP102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)12 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923200
Core clock speed719 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistors915 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate12.13336.6
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16200
L1 Cache32 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.56.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce 805A has 1567% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and P102-100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook graphics card while P102-100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 41 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 805A or P102-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.