GRID M60-1Q vs GeForce 805A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.01
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK208GM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed719 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistors915 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate12.13150.8
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
L1 Cache32 KB768 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.55.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 30 August 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce 805A has 1400% lower power consumption.

GRID M60-1Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and GRID M60-1Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook graphics card while GRID M60-1Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A
NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
GRID M60-1Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate GRID M60-1Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 805A or GRID M60-1Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.