800M vs GT 610

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GT 610
0.79

800M outperforms GT 610 by 49% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11041021
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Value for money0.010.02
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF119GF117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 April 2012 (11 years old)17 March 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$39.99 no data
Current price$98 (2.5x MSRP)$163
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce 800M has 100% better value for money than GT 610.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4848
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed810 MHz738 MHz
Number of transistors292 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature102 °Cno data
Texture fill rate6.5 billion/sec5.904
Floating-point performance155.5 gflops141.7 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no data
Height2.7" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1024 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGANo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimusno data+
GameWorksno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 610 0.79
GeForce 800M 1.18
+49.4%

800M outperforms GT 610 by 49% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 610 306
GeForce 800M 457
+49.3%

800M outperforms GT 610 by 49% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 610 1276
GeForce 800M 1303
+2.1%

800M outperforms GT 610 by 2% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.79 1.18
Recency 2 April 2012 17 March 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce 800M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 610 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GeForce GT 610
NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GeForce 800M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1542 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 60 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.