Radeon Instinct MI210 vs GeForce 800A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.83no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGF119Aldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (11 years ago)December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486656
Core clock speed475 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors292 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.800707.2
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs8416
L1 Cache64 KB1.6 MB
L2 Cache128 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,638 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce 800A has 1900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI210, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 800A and Radeon Instinct MI210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 800A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI210 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 800A
GeForce 800A
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
Radeon Instinct MI210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 15 votes

Rate GeForce 800A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 800A or Radeon Instinct MI210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.