ATI Radeon HD 4720 vs GeForce 800A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1148not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.34no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF119RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)11 December 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48320
Core clock speed475 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors292 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate3.80019.20
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data193 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz667 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s21.34 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 11 December 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

GeForce 800A has an age advantage of 2 years, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 267% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 800A and Radeon HD 4720. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 800A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4720 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 15 votes

Rate GeForce 800A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 800A or Radeon HD 4720, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.