ATI Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition vs GeForce 800A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1148not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.34no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF119RV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)14 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed475 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors292 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate3.8001.100
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 14 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

GeForce 800A has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 87% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 800A and Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 800A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 15 votes

Rate GeForce 800A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 800A or Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.