ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 vs GeForce 800A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1144not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.33no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF119M9+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 March 2014 (11 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores485
Core clock speed475 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistors292 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.8000.8
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.72 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GeForce 800A has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 800A and Mobility Radeon 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 800A
GeForce 800A
ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
Mobility Radeon 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 15 votes

Rate GeForce 800A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 800A or Mobility Radeon 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.