ATI FirePro V3800 vs GeForce 800A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1145not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.33no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF119Redwood
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (11 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48400
Core clock speed475 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors292 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate3.80013.00
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs820
L1 Cache64 KB40 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 43 Watt

GeForce 800A has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 186.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 800A and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 800A is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V3800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 800A
GeForce 800A
ATI FirePro V3800
FirePro V3800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 15 votes

Rate GeForce 800A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 53 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 800A or FirePro V3800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.