Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 vs GeForce 7950 GX2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1293not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.34no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameG71Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 June 2006 (19 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.00 ×2no data
ROPs16 ×2no data
TMUs24 ×2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×2no data
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2006 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GX2 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GX2 is a desktop graphics card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GX2
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 58 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7950 GX2 or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.