Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce 7950 GX2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1295not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.34no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG71Spectre SL
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 June 2006 (19 years ago)17 September 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed500 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speedno data655 MHz
Number of transistors278 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00 ×26.396
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2047 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×28
TMUs24 ×212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.0
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2006 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 17 Watt

R4 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 8 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 547.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GX2 and Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GX2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GX2
AMD Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 58 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 56 votes

Rate Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7950 GX2 or Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.