ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3 vs GeForce 7950 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1174not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG71RV670
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 August 2006 (19 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$114.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed550 MHz669 MHz
Number of transistors278 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2010.70
ROPs1616
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1700 MBps
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s54.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x DVI

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 145 Watt

7950 GT has 123.1% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3850 X3, on the other hand, has a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GT and Radeon HD 3850 X3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7950 GT
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
Radeon HD 3850 X3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 30 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7950 GT or Radeon HD 3850 X3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.