Radeon Graphics 128SP vs GeForce 7950 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG71Raphael
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 August 2006 (19 years ago)27 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$114.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed550 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors278 million3,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2017.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs248
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L0 Cacheno data32 KB
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 August 2006 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 128SP has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 333% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GT and Radeon Graphics 128SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 30 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 128SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7950 GT or Radeon Graphics 128SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.