RTX A2000 Embedded vs GeForce 7950 GT AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data56.50
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG71GA107S
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 April 2007 (18 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed500 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1177 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0094.16
Floating-point processing powerno data6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2007 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

RTX A2000 Embedded has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GT AGP and RTX A2000 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GT AGP is a desktop graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT AGP
GeForce 7950 GT AGP
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX A2000 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7950 GT AGP or RTX A2000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.