Tesla S2050 vs GeForce 7900 GTO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG71GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2006 (19 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448 ×4
Core clock speed650 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors278 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6032.14 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs1648 ×4
TMUs2456 ×4
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed660 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2006 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 900 Watt

7900 GTO has 1011% lower power consumption.

Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GTO and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GTO is a desktop graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GTO or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.