Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce 7900 GTO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG71Ellesmere
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2006 (19 years ago)24 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors278 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60179.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.728 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs24144 ×2
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed660 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s224.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2006 24 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 250 Watt

7900 GTO has 208.6% lower power consumption.

Pro Duo Polaris, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GTO and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GTO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO
GeForce 7900 GTO
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GTO or Radeon Pro Duo Polaris, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.