GeForce GT 320M vs 7900 GTO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.48
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2006 (19 years ago)15 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed650 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors278 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate15.608.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2006 15 June 2009
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 14 Watt

GT 320M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 478.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GTO and GeForce GT 320M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GTO is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 320M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO
GeForce 7900 GTO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 139 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GTO or GeForce GT 320M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.