Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs GeForce 7900 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1252not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.99no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG71Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 March 2006 (19 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed450 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors278 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8059.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2464
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s153.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 March 2006 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 150 Watt

7900 GT has 212.5% lower power consumption.

R9 270 1024SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GT and Radeon R9 270 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
GeForce 7900 GT
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 43 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GT or Radeon R9 270 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.