Quadro FX 4000 SDI vs GeForce 7900 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1252not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.98no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG71NV41
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 March 2006 (19 years ago)19 April 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed450 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors278 million190 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate10.805.100
ROPs168
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data214 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 4x SDI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 March 2006 19 April 2004
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 150 Watt

7900 GT has an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GT and Quadro FX 4000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GT is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 4000 SDI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
GeForce 7900 GT
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI
Quadro FX 4000 SDI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 43 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GT or Quadro FX 4000 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.