Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs GeForce 7900 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1246not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG71Barcelo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2006 (19 years ago)6 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$259 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors278 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate9.00050.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2028

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed660 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2006 6 January 2022
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 448SP Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 8.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GS and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7900 GS
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 42 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 56 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GS or Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.