Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce 7900 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1259not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.99no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameG71Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2006 (20 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$259 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8192
Core clock speed450 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors278 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs20256
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 500 Watt

7900 GS has 920% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GS and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GS is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 43 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GS or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.