Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP vs GeForce 7800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1242not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG70Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 June 2005 (20 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed430 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors302 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.323.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length228 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 June 2005 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 15 Watt

HD 8240 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 8 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 473.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7800 GTX and Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7800 GTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX
GeForce 7800 GTX
AMD Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate GeForce 7800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7800 GTX or Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.