RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce 7300 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1458not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.63no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG72AD103
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 January 2006 (19 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data9728
Core clock speed450 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors112 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800510.7
Floating-point processing powerno data32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs2112
TMUs4304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed266 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.256 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2006 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 120 Watt

7300 GS has 421.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7300 GS and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7300 GS is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS
GeForce 7300 GS
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 98 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7300 GS or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.