Arc A750 vs GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.99
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG72DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 January 2006 (18 years ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed450 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors112 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800537.6
ROPs2112
TMUs4224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed532 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.256 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2006 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 225 Watt

7300 GS Low Profile has 878.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile and Arc A750. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 766 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.