UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce 720M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1059
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.57
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameGF117Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2013 (12 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9624
Core clock speed625 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2013 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 725% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 720M and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 720M
GeForce 720M
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 116 votes

Rate GeForce 720M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 130 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 720M or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.