Quadro K2000M Embedded vs GeForce 720A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1040not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.20no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF117EXK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 July 2014 (11 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed775 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed938 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate15.0133.86
Floating-point processing power0.1801 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632
L1 Cache128 KB32 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.13.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2014 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 45 Watt

GeForce 720A has an age advantage of 2 years, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

K2000M Embedded, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 720A and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 720A is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 720A
GeForce 720A
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 720A or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.