GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs 720A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1046not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.21no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF117GT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 July 2014 (11 years ago)17 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240 ×2
Core clock speed775 MHz648 MHz
Boost clock speed938 MHzno data
Number of transistors585 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate15.0151.84 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1801 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs1680 ×2
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data275 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1152 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s147.5 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2014 17 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 315 Watt

GeForce 720A has an age advantage of 5 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 854.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 285 X2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 720A and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 720A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 285 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 720A
GeForce 720A
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 X2
GeForce GTX 285 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 285 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 720A or GeForce GTX 285 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.