GMA 3150 vs GeForce 7150M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14841536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameC67Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores316
Core clock speed1 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemorySystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 7150M 18
+800%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
World of Tanks 8−9 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Valorant 0−1 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm

GMA 3150 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7150M and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7150M
GeForce 7150M
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 141 vote

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.