Radeon 680M vs GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.72
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC67Rembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date16 November 2007 (17 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed425 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors112 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.85105.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 November 2007 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M nForce 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1104 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.