Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.86
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameC68Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data576
Core clock speed425 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors112 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.85no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 9 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 7050 PV nForce 630a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.