Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV40Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 April 2004 (21 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors222 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1664 ×2
TMUs16224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed550 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 April 2004 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 230 Watt

6800 Ultra DDL has 130% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.