GRID K520Q vs GeForce 6800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.39no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV45GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 June 2004 (21 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536 ×2
Core clock speed350 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors222 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)67 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60095.36 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs16128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s160.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2004 2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 67 Watt 225 Watt

6800 GT has 235.8% lower power consumption.

GRID K520Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6800 GT and GRID K520Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6800 GT is a desktop graphics card while GRID K520Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT
GeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIA GRID K520Q
GRID K520Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 113 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K520Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6800 GT or GRID K520Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.