T400 vs GeForce 620M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.20
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF117TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed625 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0034.20
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1624
L1 Cache128 KB384 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.17.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

GeForce 620M has 100% lower power consumption.

T400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 620M and T400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 620M is a notebook graphics card while T400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 40 votes

Rate GeForce 620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 413 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 620M or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.