Tesla M2075 vs GeForce 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1517not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNV43GF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2004 (21 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39.99 $2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed300 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors146 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20032.14
Floating-point processing powerno data1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs456
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length190 mm248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s150.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 40 nm

Tesla M2075 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 and Tesla M2075. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M2075 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200
GeForce 6200
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 86 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 or Tesla M2075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.