GeForce GT 240M LE vs 6200 TurboCache

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1501not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNV44 B2G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 December 2004 (21 years ago)15 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed350 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors75 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate1.4009.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2004 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm

GT 240M LE has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 TurboCache and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 TurboCache is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 61 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 TurboCache or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.