Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs GeForce 6200 AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV18 C1Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2003 (22 years ago)3 December 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed230 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors29 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate0.92336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed66 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.056 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video6x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2003 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

Pro WX 8100 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 AGP and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 AGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP
GeForce 6200 AGP
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 46 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 AGP or Radeon Pro WX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.