Quadro P520 vs GeForce 6200 AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.79
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV18 C1GP108
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date14 December 2003 (21 years ago)23 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed230 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1493 MHz
Number of transistors29 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate0.9235.83
Floating-point processing powerno data1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed66 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.056 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2003 23 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

Quadro P520 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 AGP and Quadro P520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 AGP is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP
GeForce 6200 AGP
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 46 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 110 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 AGP or Quadro P520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.