Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient vs GeForce 6150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1548not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameC51Raven
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2004 (21 years ago)23 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed475 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1011 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.4824.26
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7764 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Vega 6 Mobile Efficient has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6150 and Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6150 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 33 votes

Rate GeForce 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6150 or Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.