STG-2000 vs GeForce 615

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1019not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.88no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF108NV1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed660 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate5.2800.08
Floating-point processing power0.1267 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3FPM
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)1.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 2 Watt

GeForce 615 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 2350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 615 and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 615 is a notebook card while STG-2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 615
GeForce 615
NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 116 votes

Rate GeForce 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 65 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.