Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient vs GeForce 615

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1029not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF108Raven
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)23 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48384
Core clock speed660 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1011 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.28024.26
Floating-point performance0.1267 gflops0.7764 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 6 Mobile Efficient has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 226.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 615 and Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 615 is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 615
GeForce 615
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 115 votes

Rate GeForce 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.