Radeon Pro W5300M vs GeForce 615

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1097not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.90no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2012 (14 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481280
Core clock speed660 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors585 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate5.280100.0
Floating-point processing power0.1267 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 85 Watt

GeForce 615 has 73% lower power consumption.

Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 615 and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 615 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 119 votes

Rate GeForce 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 615 or Radeon Pro W5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.