RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs GeForce 615

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1097not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.90no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF108AD103
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores489728 ×2
Core clock speed660 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors585 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate5.280510.7 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1267 TFLOPS32.69 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4112 ×2
TMUs8304 ×2
Tensor Coresno data304 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data76 ×2
L1 Cache64 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s576.0 GB/s ×2
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 615 has 206.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 615 and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 615 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 615
GeForce 615
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 118 votes

Rate GeForce 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 615 or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.