Matrox Parhelia 128 MB vs GeForce 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1155not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.31no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGF119Parhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)25 June 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed738 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors292 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.9040.8
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPSno data
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.5
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GeForce 610M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 610M and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 610M is a notebook card while Matrox Parhelia 128 MB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
Parhelia 128 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 742 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 128 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.