Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs GeForce 6100

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code nameC51Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2004 (19 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$64 no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2
Core clock speed425 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data123 Million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm45 nm
Texture fill rate0.43no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 6100 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIno data
WidthIGPno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/Ano data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 11 October 2004 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6100 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6100 is a desktop card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6100
GeForce 6100
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 54 votes

Rate GeForce 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 329 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.