Radeon RX 6800M vs GeForce 6100 + nForce 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.76
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC61Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2004 (21 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed425 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2390 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data145 Watt
Texture fill rate0.43382.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm

RX 6800M has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6100 + nForce 420 and Radeon RX 6800M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6100 + nForce 420 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 420
GeForce 6100 + nForce 420
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce 6100 nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 335 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6100 + nForce 420 or Radeon RX 6800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.