Radeon Pro VII vs GeForce 6100 + nForce 400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.85
Power efficiencyno data9.15
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC61Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2004 (20 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed425 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.43408.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.06 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1024 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 13 May 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm

Pro VII has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6100 + nForce 400 and Radeon Pro VII. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6100 + nForce 400 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 400
GeForce 6100 + nForce 400
AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 6100 nForce 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1549 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.