Riva TNT vs GeForce 510 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameGF119NV4
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 September 2011 (14 years ago)23 March 1998 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed523 MHz90 MHz
Number of transistors292 million7 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.1840.18
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs82
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 2x
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed898 MHz110 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.37 GB/s1.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)5.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2011 23 March 1998
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 350 nm

510 OEM has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 510 OEM and Riva TNT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GeForce 510 OEM
NVIDIA Riva TNT
Riva TNT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 34 votes

Rate GeForce 510 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 85 votes

Rate Riva TNT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 510 OEM or Riva TNT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.