Radeon Pro V340 16 GB vs GeForce 410M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1245not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.24no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF119Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (15 years ago)26 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483584 ×2
Core clock speed575 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors292 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate4.600336.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs464 ×2
TMUs8224 ×2
L1 Cache64 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL+4.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 26 August 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 230 Watt

GeForce 410M has 1817% lower power consumption.

Pro V340 16 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 410M and Radeon Pro V340 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 410M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V340 16 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 346 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 410M or Radeon Pro V340 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.