GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) vs 405M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT218NV11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)1 March 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161
Core clock speed606 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data166 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate4.848no data
Floating-point processing power0.03878 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit32 / 64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 APIDDR
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 1 March 2001
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 2 Watt

GeForce 405M has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

2 Go (200 / 100), on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 405M and GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100). We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M
NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 401 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 405M or GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.